Key result
Preoperative CT shows ~92% positive predictive value for identifying well-differentiated retroperitoneal liposarcoma.
Why the study?
Accurate preoperative diagnosis of retroperitoneal liposarcoma subtypes is necessary, and the potential of CT to differentiate these types was explored.
Can computed tomography (CT) differentiate between histologic subtypes of retroperitoneal liposarcoma?
Observational (n=47)
Single-blind
No
Can computed tomography (CT) differentiate between histologic subtypes of retroperitoneal liposarcoma?
CT scanning can help evaluate retroperitoneal liposarcoma tumor types to guide biopsy location and therapeutic schemes.
CT may guide biopsy planning in retroperitoneal liposarcoma; hypothesis-generating from Level 5 data and requires validation.
OBJECTIVE: Liposarcoma (LPS) is the most common soft tissue sarcoma and accounts for approximately 20% of all mesenchymal malignancies, often occurring in deep soft tissue of retroperitoneal space. Accurate preoperative diagnosis is therefore necessary. We explored whether computed tomography (CT) could be used to differentiate between the various types of retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RPLS). METHOD: Forty-seven cases of RPLS, diagnosed surgically and histologically, were analyzed retrospectively. CT features were correlated with postoperative pathological appearance. RESULTS: The study radiologist identified 29, 11, 2, 2 and 3 RPLS as atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma (ALT/WDL), dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDL), myxoid/round cell liposarcoma (ML/RCL), pleomorphic liposarcoma (PL) and mixed-type liposarcoma. Analysis of CT scans revealed the following typical findings of the different subtypes of RPLS: ALT/WDL was mainly visible as a well-delineated fatty hypodense tumor with uniform density and integrity margin; DDL was marked by the combination of focal nodular density and hypervascularity. ML/RCL, PL and mixed liposarcoma showed malignant biological behaviour and CT findings need further studies. CONCLUSIONS: CT scanning can reveal important details including internal components, margins and surrounding tissues. Based on CT findings, tumor type can be roughly evaluated and biopsy location and therapeutic scheme guided.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lü et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Retroperitoneal liposarcoma (n=47). Computed Tomography (CT) scan vs. Histopathological diagnosis was evaluated on Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of CT for diagnosing atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma (ALT/WDL). Preoperative CT scanning demonstrated a sensitivity of 75.9% and a positive predictive value of 91.7% for identifying atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated retroperitoneal liposarcoma.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: