Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Visual estimation of stream salmonid abundance using strip transect sighting models has become commonplace. Application of visual estimation to other stream fishes, particularly benthic forms, has been limited. Examination of the distribution of sighting distances for the Roanoke darter (Percina roanoka), Roanoke logperch (P. rex), and black jumprock (Moxostoma cervinum) indicates that strip transect sighting models that assume probability of sighting remaining constant out to the limits of observer visibility are not appropriate for these benthic species. Our datasets indicate that distance sampling models that assume decreased sighting probability with increasing distance of the target from the observer provide a reasonable alternative to strip transect sighting models. There was a strong positive correlation between abundance estimates calculated using two alternative distance sampling models, as well as between the distance sampling model estimates and an estimate of abundance obtained with a backpack electroshocker.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ensign et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: