PURPOSE: To report a prospective study that explored the therapeutic strategies in the treatment of type B aortic intramural hematoma (IMH) and evaluated the role of endovascular repair. METHODS: Between January 2001 and December 2009, 56 consecutive patients were enrolled in a prospective study to evaluate stent-graft repair versus medical therapy for acute type B IMH (patients with type A IMH excluded). Patients who had penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers, maximum aortic diameter >45 mm, hematoma thickness >10 mm, or sustained chest or back pain despite maximal medical therapy received endovascular stent-grafts (n=33; mean age 60 years, range 33-86), while other patients (n=23; mean age 56 years, range 29-83) received conservative therapy. RESULTS: Stent-grafts were implanted successfully as scheduled in 33 patients as elective procedures; there were no complications related to the procedure. The mean follow-up up was 28±15 months (range 3-108). In the medically treated patients, there were 6 (26%) cases of IMH progression (4 treated with stent-grafts) and 2 (9%) deaths versus no IMH progression or death in the stent-graft patients. The thickness of the hematoma was reduced in all 37 patients receiving stent-grafts, and the maximum aortic diameter decreased in 19 of these patients. The 17 surviving patients in the medical group also showed regression of the hematoma in follow-up. CONCLUSION: Type B IMH is a potentially lethal disease, and the application of endovascular stent-grafts achieved an encouraging result in this study. Therefore, a more optimistic strategy, including endovascular repair, should be considered and evaluated in the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: