Key result
Protocol outlines the Anzhen risk score to predict acute type A aortic dissection mortality using malperfusion.
Why the study?
Malperfusion syndrome is the main risk factor for poor ATAAD prognosis, but a risk scoring system for ATAAD based on malperfusion syndrome is lacking.
Observational (n=3,000)
No
Introduction: Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is a catastrophic disease with fatal outcomes. Malperfusion syndrome (MPS) is a serious complication of ATAAD, with an incidence of 20–40%. Many studies have shown that MPS is the main risk factor for poor ATAAD prognosis. However, a risk scoring system for ATAAD based on MPS is lacking. Here, we designed a risk scoring system for ATAAD to assess mortality through quantitative assessment of relevant organ malperfusion and subsequently develop rational treatment strategies. Methods and analysis: This was a prospective observational study. Patients’ perioperative clinical data were collected to establish a database of ATAAD (N≥3000) and determine whether these patients had malperfusion complications. The Anzhen risk scoring system was established on the basis of organ malperfusion by using a random forest survival model and a logistics model. The better method was then chosen to establish a revised risk scoring system. Ethics and dissemination: This study received ethical approval from the Ethics Committees of Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University (KS2019034-1). Patient consent was waived because biological samples were not collected, and no patient rights were violated. Findings will be disseminated at scientific conferences and in peer-reviewed publications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jia et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) (n=3,000). Organ malperfusion was evaluated on Mortality. This prospective observational study protocol aims to establish the Anzhen risk scoring system to assess mortality in patients with acute type A aortic dissection based on organ malperfusion.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: