Eight strains of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans (laboratory strains Tf-1 [= ATCC 13661] and Tf-2 [= ATCC 19859] and mine isolates SM-1, SM-2, SM-3, SM-4, SM-5, and SM-8) and three strains of Thiobacillus thiooxidans (laboratory strain Tt [= ATCC 8085] and mine isolates SM-6 and SM-7) were grown on ferrous iron (Fe), elemental sulfur (S), or sulfide ore (Fe, Cu, and Zn). The cells were studied for their aerobic Fe - and S-oxidizing activities (O(2) consumption) and anaerobic S-oxidizing activity with ferric iron (Fe) (Fe formation). Fe-grown T. ferrooxidans cells oxidized S aerobically at a rate of 2 to 4% of the Fe oxidation rate. The rate of anaerobic S oxidation with Fe was equal to the aerobic oxidation rate in SM-1, SM-3, SM-4, and SM-5, but was only one-half or less that in Tf-1, Tf-2, SM-2, and SM-8. Transition from growth on Fe to that on S produced cells with relatively undiminished Fe oxidation activities and increased S oxidation (both aerobic and anaerobic) activities in Tf-2, SM-4, and SM-5, whereas it produced cells with dramatically reduced Fe oxidation and anaerobic S oxidation activities in Tf-1, SM-1, SM-2, SM-3, and SM-8. Growth on ore 1 of metal-leaching Fe-grown strains and on ore 2 of all Fe-grown strains resulted in very high yields of cells with high Fe and S oxidation (both aerobic and anaerobic) activities with similar ratios of various activities. Sulfur-grown Tf-2, SM-1, SM-4, SM-6, SM-7, and SM-8 cultures leached metals from ore 3, and Tf-2 and SM-4 cells recovered showed activity ratios similar to those of other ore-grown cells. It is concluded that all the T. ferrooxidans strains studied have the ability to produce cells with Fe and S oxidation and Fe reduction activities, but their levels are influenced by growth substrates and strain differences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suzuki et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: