The unimolecular decomposition of the C 6 H 5 radical has been studied by ab initio molecular orbital and statistical-theory calculations. Three low-energy decomposition channels, including the commonly assumed decyclization/fragmentation process yielding n -C 4 H 3 + C 2 H 2, have been identified. With a modified Gaussian-2 method of Mebel et al. (ref 17), the energy barrier for the decyclization of C 6 H 5 was calculated to be 66.5 kcal/mol with the corresponding recyclization energy of 5.6 kcal/mol. The two open-chain 1-dehydrohexa-1,3-dien-5-yne radicals (with HCĊH cis and trans structures) may undergo further fragmentation reactions producing n -C 4 H 3 + C 2 H 2 and l -C 6 H 4 (1,5-hexadiyn-3-ene) + H with the predicted barriers of 44.0 and 36.1 kcal/mol, respectively. The dominant decomposition channel of C 6 H 5 was found to take place barrierlessly by C−H breaking, producing o -C 6 H 4 ( o -benzyne) + H with the predicted endothermicity of 76.0 kcal/mol. RRKM calculations have been carried out for the production of n -C 4 H 3 + C 2 H 2, l -C 6 H 4 + H, and o -C 6 H 4 + H with the coupled multichannel mechanism, which includes the reversible decyclization/recyclization reactions. The results of the calculations indicate that at T < 1500 K o -C 6 H 4 is the major product of the decomposition reaction. Above 1500 K, the formation of l -C 6 H 4 becomes competitive with its cyclic isomer. However, the formation of the commonly assumed n -C 4 H 3 + C 2 H 2 products was found to be least competitive. Rate constants for all three product channels from C 6 H 5 as well as those from the bimolecular reaction of n -C 4 H 3 with C 2 H 2 producing C 6 H 5, o -C 6 H 4 + H, and l -C 6 H 4 + H have been calculated as functions of temperature and pressure for practical applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Madden et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: