Key result
Tolerogenic macrophages lower RV end-systolic pressure by ~63% in a pulmonary hypertension rat model.
Why the study?
Inflammation plays a major role in the pathogenesis of PH, motivating investigation into the effects of cell-based immunomodulation in a dysimmune model of PH.
Does immunomodulation therapy using tolerogenic macrophages improve pulmonary hypertension phenotype in a rodent model?
Does immunomodulation therapy using tolerogenic macrophages improve pulmonary hypertension phenotype in a rodent model?
Immunomodulation with tolerogenic macrophages reduces right ventricular end-systolic pressure and attenuates pulmonary vascular remodeling in a rodent model of pulmonary hypertension.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Does not support clinical use in pulmonary hypertension; leaves open further preclinical testing of tolerogenic macrophages.
Inflammation plays a major role in the pathogenesis of pulmonary hypertension (PH). We sought to investigate the effects of a cell-based immunomodulation in a dysimmune model of PH. PH was induced in athymic nude rats using semaxinib (Su group, n = 6). Tolerogenic macrophages (toM) were generated from monocyte isolation and then injected either the day before semaxinib injection (Prevention group, n = 6) or 3 weeks after (Reversion group, n = 6). Six athymic nude rats were used as controls. In vivo trafficking of toM was investigated with bioluminescence imaging showing that toM were mainly located into the lungs until 48 h after injection. Right ventricular (RV) end-systolic pressure and RV systolic function were assessed at 4 weeks using echocardiography. Morphometric analysis and RNA sequencing of the lungs were realized at 4 weeks. Rats treated with toM (Prevention and Reversion groups) had a significantly lower RV end-systolic pressure at 4 weeks (respectively, 25 ± 8 and 30 ± 6 mmHg vs. 67 ± 9 mmHg, P < 0.001), while RV systolic dysfunction was observed in Su and Reversion groups. Mean medial wall thickness of small arterioles was lower in Prevention and Reversion groups compared with the Su group (respectively, 10.9% ± 0.8% and 16.4% ± 1.3% vs. 28.2% ± 2.1%, P < 0.001). Similarly, cardiomyocyte area was decreased in rats treated with toM (150 ± 18 and 160 ± 86 μm2 vs. 279 ± 50 μm2, P < 0.001). A trend toward upregulation of genes involved in pulmonary arterial hypertension pathobiology was found in Su rats, while KCNK3 was significantly downregulated (fold-change = 9.8, P < 0.001). Injection of toM was associated with a less severe phenotype of PH in rats exposed to angioproliferative stress. Preserved expression of KCNK3 may explain the protective effect of toM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guihaire et al. (2021) studied Pulmonary hypertension (n=24). Tolerogenic macrophages (toM) vs. Semaxinib only (Su group) was evaluated on Right ventricular (RV) end-systolic pressure at 4 weeks (p=<0.001). In a rat model of pulmonary hypertension, treatment with tolerogenic macrophages significantly lowered right ventricular end-systolic pressure compared to untreated rats (25 and 30 mmHg vs. 67 mmHg, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: