Key result
Low-cost 3D-printed thoracic spine models earn favorable ratings for fidelity and usefulness as teaching tools.
Why the study?
Simulators for thoracic epidurals are not commonly used by anesthesia training programs to help teach the procedure.
Cross-Sectional (n=25)
No
A low-cost DIY 3D-printed thoracic spine model was well-received by anesthesia trainees and attendings as a useful teaching tool.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Low-cost 3D-printed models merit evaluation as training adjuncts; leaves open effects on skill acquisition and outcomes.
Central line placement, cricothyroidotomy, and lumbar epidural placement are common procedures for which there are simulators to help trainees learn the procedures. However, a model or a simulator for thoracic epidurals is not commonly used by anesthesia training programs to help teach the procedure. This brief technical report aims to share the design and fabrication process of a low-cost and do-it-yourself (DIY) 3D-printed thoracic spine model. Ten expert anesthesiology attendings and fifteen novice anesthesiology residents practiced with the model and were subsequently surveyed to assess their attitudes towards its fidelity and usefulness as a teaching tool. Responses were recorded with a Likert scale and found to be positive for both groups. Design files and an assembly manual were developed and made public through an open-source website.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Anesthesia training (n=25). DIY 3D-printed thoracic spine model was evaluated on Attitudes towards model fidelity and usefulness as a teaching tool (Likert scale). A low-cost, do-it-yourself 3D-printed thoracic spine model was rated favorably for fidelity and usefulness as a teaching tool by both expert anesthesiology attendings and novice residents.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: