Key result
Rivaroxaban lowers total costs ~46% vs enoxaparin for VTE prophylaxis after major orthopaedic surgery.
Why the study?
A clinical economic analysis comparing enoxaparin, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran etexilate for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after vast orthopaedic operations within the Russian Federation public health system was needed.
Is rivaroxaban or dabigatran more cost-effective than enoxaparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients after vast orthopaedic operations?
Is rivaroxaban or dabigatran more cost-effective than enoxaparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients after vast orthopaedic operations?
Rivaroxaban is the most cost-effective option for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after major orthopaedic surgery in the Russian Federation public health system.
Supports rivaroxaban preference for VTE prophylaxis after major orthopedic surgery in Russia; confirms cost advantage over enoxaparin and dabigatran in public systems.
Clinical economic analysis of the use of enoxaparin, rivaroxaban and dabigatran etexilate for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (VTP) in patients after vast orthopaedic operations within the RF public health system was performed. For cost calculation the modelling of decision tree where the presence/absence of clinically significant hemorrhages as the index of anticoagulant safety and VTP incidence as efficacy index were considered. The model was based on the meta-analysis of the published randomized studies results and indirect comparison performed using those data. Only direct medical costs were taken into account. Anticoagulant therapy costs were calculated for the drug dosing regimen according to the use instructions registered in RF. The time horizon of the model was in line with the average duration of thromboprophylaxis after orthopaedic operations: 21 day for enoxaparin and dabigatran, and 25 days for rivaroxaban. Determinate analysis of sensitivity including the evaluation of clinical and economic efficacy of drugs after either total hip or knee arthroplasty was performed. Total costs per patient made up 11 486.99 rub for enoxaparin, 9 035.07 rub for dabigatran and 6 172.63 rub for rivaroxaban use. During sensitivity analysis rivaroxaban preserved its advantage in all scenarios. Rivaroxaban is a preferable drug for VTP prophylaxis after vast orthopaedic interventions as with higher clinical efficacy it requires lower costs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eskin et al. (2016) studied Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after vast orthopaedic operations. Rivaroxaban vs. Enoxaparin and dabigatran etexilate was evaluated on Total costs per patient. Rivaroxaban was the most cost-effective option for VTE prophylaxis after major orthopaedic surgery, with total costs per patient of 6,172 rubles vs 11,487 for enoxaparin and 9,035 for dabigatran.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: