Key result
RVFL networks outperform traditional deep learning, reaching ~82% diagnostic accuracy for CAD.
Why the study?
Deep learning models for medical diagnostics have high computational demands and lack transparency, limiting their use in time-critical and resource-constrained healthcare settings.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized machine learning models like RVFL combined with explainable AI offer high diagnostic accuracy with significantly reduced computational time for diseases including coronary artery disease.
Deep learning-based models have revolutionized medical diagnostics by using Big Data to enhance disease diagnosis and clinical decision-making. However, their significant computational demands and opaque decision-making processes, often characterized as "black-box" systems, pose major challenges in time-critical and resource-constrained healthcare settings. To address these issues, this study explores the application of randomized machine learning models, specifically Extreme Learning Machines (ELMs) and Random Vector Functional Link (RVFL) networks, in medical diagnostics. These models introduce stochasticity into their training processes, reducing computational complexity and training times while maintaining accuracy. Furthermore, we integrate Explainable AI techniques namely Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) and Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) to explain the decision-making rationale of ELMs and RVFL. Performance evaluations on genitourinary cancers and coronary artery disease datasets demonstrate that RVFL outperforms traditional deep learning models, achieving superior accuracy of 88.29% with a computational overhead of 6.22 seconds for genitourinary cancers, and an accuracy of 81.64% with a computational time of 0.0308 seconds for coronary artery disease. This research highlights the potential of randomized models in enhancing efficiency and transparency in medical diagnosis, thereby accelerating better treatment outcomes and advocating for more accessible and interpretable AI solutions in healthcare.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmad et al. (2024) studied Genitourinary cancers and coronary artery disease. Random Vector Functional Link (RVFL) networks and Extreme Learning Machines (ELMs) vs. Traditional deep learning models was evaluated on Accuracy and computational time. Random Vector Functional Link (RVFL) networks outperformed traditional deep learning models, achieving 88.29% accuracy for genitourinary cancers and 81.64% for coronary artery disease.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: