// Gloria Bonuccelli 1 , Ernestina Marianna De Francesco 1,2 , Rianne de Boer 1 , Herbert B. Tanowitz 3 and Michael P. Lisanti 4 1 The Paterson Building, University of Manchester, Withington, M20 4BX, United Kingdom 2 Department of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, Rende, 87036, Italy 3 Departments of Pathology and Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA 4 Translational Medicine, School of Environment and Life Sciences, Biomedical Research Centre, University of Salford, Greater Manchester, M5 4WT, United Kingdom Correspondence to: Michael P. Lisanti, email: // Gloria Bonuccelli, email: // Keywords : cancer stem-like cells; metabolic heterogeneity; metabolic cell fractionation; mitochondria; NADH Received : January 10, 2017 Accepted : January 25, 2017 Published : February 16, 2017 Abstract Here, we assembled a broad molecular “tool-kit” to interrogate the role of metabolic heterogeneity in the propagation of cancer stem-like cells (CSCs). First, we subjected MCF7 cells to “metabolic fractionation” by flow cytometry, using fluorescent mitochondrial probes to detect PCG1α activity, as well ROS and hydrogen-peroxide (H2O2) production; NADH levels were also monitored by auto-fluorescence. Then, the various cell populations were functionally assessed for “stem cell activity”, using the mammosphere assay (3D-spheroids). Our results indicate that a sub-population of MCF7 cells, with increased PGC1α activity, high mitochondrial ROS/H2O2 production and high NADH levels, all form mammospheres with a higher efficiency. Thus, it appears that mitochondrial oxidative stress and the anti-oxidant response both contribute to the promotion of mitochondrial biogenesis and oxidative metabolism in CSCs. Further validation was provided by using specific inhibitors to target metabolic processes (the NAD+ salvage pathway, glycolysis, mitochondrial protein synthesis and OXPHOS), significantly reducing CSC propagation. As a consequence, we have now identified a variety of clinically-approved drugs (stiripentol), natural products (caffeic acid phenyl ester (CAPE), ascorbic acid, silibinin) and experimental pharmaceuticals (actinonin, FK866, 2-DG), that can be used to effectively inhibit CSC activity. We discuss the use of CAPE (derived from honey-bee propolis) and Vitamin C, as potential natural therapeutic modalities. In this context, Vitamin C was ~10 times more potent than 2-DG for the targeting of CSCs. Similarly, stiripentol was between 50 to 100 times more potent than 2-DG.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bonuccelli et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: