Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
RESEARCH QUESTION: Is non-inferiority demonstrated for highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin (HP-HMG) in an injection pen versus the US approved HP-HMG powder formulation for number of fertilized oocytes in women undergoing ovarian stimulation? DESIGN: Randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group, multicentre, non-inferiority trial at 19 US reproductive medicine centres enrolling 401 women ages 18‒42 years, randomised 1:1 to HP-HMG pen or HP-HMG powder. After downregulation in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) cycle, ovaries were stimulated with HP-HMG pen or HP-HMG powder at a starting dose of 225 IU for the first 5 days, with subsequent dose adjustments as needed. The number of fertilized (two pronuclei [2PN]) oocytes 19 ± 2 h after insemination was the primary end point. RESULTS: The primary end point was met, and HP-HMG pen was non-inferior to HP-HMG powder, with the mean ± SD number of fertilized 2PN oocytes 8.2 ± 5.5 and 6.6 ± 4.3, respectively (adjusted treatment difference: 1.50, 95% CI 0.57 to 2.42). The number of oocytes retrieved was 14.3 ± 8.1 with HP-HMG pen and 11.4 ± 6.3 with HP-HMG powder. The mean number of blastocysts was 4.8 ± 3.8 in the HP-HMG pen group and 3.9 ± 3.0 in the HP-HMG powder group. The ongoing pregnancy rate per started stimulation cycle was 45.0% in the HP-HMG pen group and 42.7% in the HP-HMG powder group and the live birth rate was 44.1% and 42.2% after fresh transfer, respectively. The incidence of early ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was 3.5% in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: HP-HMG as a solution for injection in a pre-filled injection pen is an effective and safe alternative to the approved powder formulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Witz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: