Key result
Machine-learning models predict postoperative events in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with ~0.88 AUC.
Why the study?
The study was designed to predict intra-operative and postoperative events consequential to the derailment of the ideal clinical course of patient recovery in patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.
Can machine-learning models accurately predict intra-operative and postoperative events in patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy?
Observational (n=1,690)
Yes
Can machine-learning models accurately predict intra-operative and postoperative events in patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy?
Machine learning models can predict intra-operative and postoperative events with good accuracy in patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy, potentially allowing for timely interventions to avert complications.
ML models may support risk stratification in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
OBJECTIVE: To predict intra-operative (IOEs) and postoperative events (POEs) consequential to the derailment of the ideal clinical course of patient recovery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Vattikuti Collective Quality Initiative is a multi-institutional dataset of patients who underwent robot-assisted partial nephectomy for kidney tumours. Machine-learning (ML) models were constructed to predict IOEs and POEs using logistic regression, random forest and neural networks. The models to predict IOEs used patient demographics and preoperative data. In addition to these, intra-operative data were used to predict POEs. Performance on the test dataset was assessed using area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) and area under the precision-recall curve (PR-AUC). RESULTS: The rates of IOEs and POEs were 5.62% and 20.98%, respectively. Models for predicting IOEs were constructed using data from 1690 patients and 38 variables; the best model had an AUC-ROC of 0.858 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.762, 0.936) and a PR-AUC of 0.590 (95% CI 0.400, 0.759). Models for predicting POEs were trained using data from 1406 patients and 59 variables; the best model had an AUC-ROC of 0.875 (95% CI 0.834, 0.913) and a PR-AUC 0.706 (95% CI, 0.610, 0.790). CONCLUSIONS: The performance of the ML models in the present study was encouraging. Further validation in a multi-institutional clinical setting with larger datasets would be necessary to establish their clinical value. ML models can be used to predict significant events during and after surgery with good accuracy, paving the way for application in clinical practice to predict and intervene at an opportune time to avert complications and improve patient outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhandari et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Kidney tumours (n=1,690). Machine-learning models was evaluated on Prediction of postoperative events (POEs) (AUC-ROC 0.875, 95% CI 0.834-0.913). Machine-learning models predicted postoperative events (AUC-ROC 0.875; 95% CI 0.834-0.913) and intra-operative events (AUC-ROC 0.858; 95% CI 0.762-0.936) in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: