Studies on branches of field-grown Pinus contorta Dougl. trees showed that: (i) branches with fully developed male or female cones were heavier than vegetative branches; (ii) the production of female cones decreased neither the number of laterals nor the length of the terminal or lateral shoots on the cone-bearing branches; (iii) the production of male cones decreased both the number of laterals and the number of needles on the cone-bearing branches; (iv) needles on male cone-bearing branches had significantly higher photosynthetic rates and needles on female cone-bearing branches generally also fixed more CO(2) per quantum of light. In addition, both male and female cones refixed a significant proportion of respired CO(2) when illuminated. The simulation model, MAESTRO, was used to estimate light penetration through two stands (3690 and 1845 trees ha(-1)) of P. contorta trees and to calculate the resultant CO(2) assimilation of a vegetative, a male and a female cone-bearing tree on sunny, partly sunny and cloudy days in Scotland. Generally, the CO(2) efflux from female cones was less than 3% of the CO(2) assimilated by the whole tree. The presence of male cones resulted in an average 33% decrease in needle complement, but an increased quantum efficiency of associated needles in the autumn. It was estimated that, on a sunny day, male cone-bearing trees assimilated as much CO(2) as vegetative trees in the high density stand and only 6% less in the low density stand. On cloudy days, the smaller needle complement was beneficial to the carbon economy of the tree because of lower respiration losses compared with a vegetative tree.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dick et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: