While many factors affect the organizational shape that managers in professional services firms should achieve, one has the greatest importance: the ratio of junior, mid‐level, and senior staff, usually referred to as a firm's leverage. The tensions between short‐term (market demand and firm profitability—a static equilibrium issue) and long‐term issues (organizational structure and professional development—a dynamic equilibrium issue) were analyzed in a modeling for learning project. Managing a professional service firm implies important trade‐offs between satisfying staff development and financial performance. A hiring and promotion proactive policy aimed at satisfying professional staff development leads to an expensive organizational structure without any certainty for future growth perspectives. However, a reactive hiring policy is not better since it burns out mid‐level staff due to delays in training and hiring, which increase staff departures. Therefore, a widely applied “up‐or‐out promotion system” seems to be the right policy for managing professional services firms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martin Kunc (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: