In order to compare the effects of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) as a filler, MCC and high-density polyethylene (HDPE) composites were produced with 4 different wt.% MCC loadings (1 wt.%, 5 wt.%, 10 wt.%, and 20 wt.%). To improve the compatibility between MCC and the matrix, MCC was acetylated with vinyl acetate (VA), and 2 different MCC-HDPE composites were produced with 5 wt.% and 10 wt.% VA-modified MCC loadings. Untreated MCC and VA-modified MCC-reinforced HDPE pellets were produced by using a twin-screw extruder. The MCC-HDPE composites were then compression-molded and the mechanical properties of the composites were determined. The thermal and morphological properties of the MCC-HDPE composites were characterized by using thermogravimetric and electron microscopy techniques, respectively. The VA-modified MCC-filled HDPE had a significantly higher tensile strength than the unmodified MCC-filled or the neat HDPE composites. The thermal stability of MCC was also improved with VA modification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Çetin et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: