Key result
Underweight BMI is linked to ~29% lower risk of intrapartum cesarean delivery versus normal BMI.
Why the study?
Factors associated with intrapartum cesarean delivery in underweight women undergoing a trial of labor, and whether underweight BMI independently influences this risk, were unknown.
Does underweight BMI reduce the risk of intrapartum cesarean delivery in women undergoing a trial of labor?
Cohort (n=77,662)
Does underweight BMI reduce the risk of intrapartum cesarean delivery in women undergoing a trial of labor?
Odds Ratio: 0.71 (95% CI 0.63–0.81)
Absolute Event Rate: 3.2% vs 4.3%
p-value: p=<0.001
Underweight BMI is independently associated with a lower risk of intrapartum cesarean delivery, and risk in this population is driven by established obstetric factors.
Should not alter labor management thresholds; leaves open whether underweight BMI independently influences cesarean risk beyond established factors.
OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with intrapartum cesarean delivery (CD) among underweight women undergoing a trial of labor, and to evaluate whether underweight BMI independently influences intrapartum cesarean risk. METHODS: who planned a trial of labor between 2012 and 2024. Women undergoing elective CD or with nonviable fetuses were excluded. Associations were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. To evaluate the independent effect of BMI, an adjusted analysis was performed on the combined underweight and normal-BMI cohort (n = 77,662). Predictive performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis, calibration testing, and decision-curve analysis. RESULTS: and attempted a trial of labor; 287 (3.2%) underwent intrapartum CD, significantly lower than in a concurrent normal-BMI cohort (4.3%, p < 0.001). In the combined cohort analysis, underweight BMI was independently associated with a lower risk of intrapartum CD (aOR 0.71, 95% CI 0.63-0.81, p < 0.001), with no significant interaction between BMI category and any identified risk factor. Seven factors were independently associated with intrapartum CD: previous CD (aOR 14.57, 95% CI 8.60-24.69), multiple gestation (aOR 8.69, 95% CI 5.16-14.64), nulliparity (aOR 7.39, 95% CI 5.05-10.81), preeclampsia (aOR 3.76, 95% CI 1.96-7.21), maternal age ≥ 40 years (aOR 2.98, 95% CI 1.90-4.68), maternal height < 160 cm (aOR 2.19, 95% CI 1.68-2.84), and induction of labor (aOR 1.66, 95% CI 1.20-2.29). The model demonstrated good discrimination (AUC 0.746, 95% bootstrap CI 0.722-0.768), with sensitivity 92.7%, PPV 6.2%, and NPV 99.1%. CONCLUSION: Underweight women have a high likelihood of successful vaginal birth. Underweight BMI was independently associated with a lower risk of intrapartum CD, with no effect modification by any established risk factor. Intrapartum cesarean risk in this population is driven by established obstetric factors rather than low BMI itself, supporting individualized, risk-based counseling and management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tako et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Pregnancy undergoing a trial of labor (n=77,662). Underweight BMI (BMI < 18.5) vs. Normal BMI was evaluated on Intrapartum cesarean delivery (CD) (aOR 0.71, 95% CI 0.63-0.81, p=<0.001). Underweight BMI was independently associated with a lower risk of intrapartum cesarean delivery compared to normal BMI (3.2% vs 4.3%; aOR 0.71, 95% CI 0.63-0.81, p < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: