Biochar is no longer considered merely a substitute for conventional fillers in asphalt materials; rather, it represents a multifunctional modifier that aligns with the goals of sustainable road design and urban mobility in smart cities. Its application now extends to the rheological modification of asphalt binders, mitigation of asphalt fume emissions, improvement in aging resistance and interfacial adhesion, and assessment of carbon sequestration potential. Biochar can improve the high-temperature stability, rutting and aging resistance, and asphalt–aggregate adhesion of asphalt materials in a suitable dosage, and at the same time reduce emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), hydrogen sulfide (H2S), and other fumes. However, the above effects are highly dependent on the biochar feedstock, production process, physicochemical properties, particle size, dosage and degree of dispersion. An excess amount or uneven distribution will reduce the crack resistance and fatigue life at low temperatures; phase separation may also occur and VOC emissions will increase. Therefore, the main problem in this area has shifted from whether biochar is effective to when it can be applied for particular pavement performance goals, what pollutant control targets are aimed for, and over what life-cycle periods. This review integrates evidence obtained at the binder, mastic, and mixture scales and critically evaluates the influence of biochar on pavement performance, fume emissions, aging, interfacial adhesion, and environmental safety. It also argues that empirical dosage selection should be replaced by coordinated optimization of biochar structure, material performance, emission mitigation, and life-cycle impacts. Verification of the low-carbon benefits and environmental safety of biochar-modified asphalt will ultimately require standardized assessment frameworks and consistently defined system boundaries. Ultimately, this work provides a foundation for integrating biochar-modified asphalt into eco-friendly and resilient road infrastructures, aligning with the goals of smart urban mobility and sustainable transportation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
柯逸晖 et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: