Key result
3D TTE correlates better with deployed ASD device size than balloon occlusive diameter or 2D echo.
Why the study?
Device sizing with balloon occlusive diameter prior to percutaneous ASD closure can cause tearing, arrhythmias, and hypotension, prompting investigation into whether 3DTTE could serve as an alternative.
Does 3-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography provide better correlation with deployed device size compared to balloon occlusive diameter and 2D echocardiography in patients undergoing percutaneous closure of secundum ASD?
Cross-Sectional (n=33)
No
Does 3-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography provide better correlation with deployed device size compared to balloon occlusive diameter and 2D echocardiography in patients undergoing percutaneous closure of secundum ASD?
3-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography provides a highly accurate alternative to balloon sizing for selecting device size in percutaneous ASD closure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
3DTTE may guide ASD device sizing without balloon risks; leaves open accuracy versus BOD in prospective validation.
Background: Secundum atrial septal defect (ASD) is treated following trans-catheter closure in alternative to surgical treatment. Per-intervention selection of device size with balloon occlusive diameter (BOD) often cause tearing or enlarging, causing arrhythmias and hypotension. We assessed the suitability of percutaneous device closure for ASD using 3-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (3DTTE). Objectives: This study was conducted to investigate if 3DTTE could be an alternative of balloon sizing for selection of device size in atrial septal defect device closure. Design: It was a cross-sectional comparative study. Methods: This study was conducted at the department of Pediatric Cardiology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University for a period of 2 years. Thirty-three purposively selected secundum ASD patients suitable for device closure were included in the study. Ethical permission was taken from the Institutional Review Board and written consent was taken from each patient’s guardian. In this study, 3DTTE derived ASD diameter and BOD were compared with that of deployed device size using correlation analysis. Results: Out of 33 patients, 63.6% were female and 36.4% were males had a mean age of 18.07 ± 14.58 years (range 2–55 years). Mean diameter of ASD measured by 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) echocardiography were 17.09 ± 6.08 mm and 21.30 ± 6.56 mm, respectively, yielding a significant difference ( p < 0.001). 3D echocardiography derived ASDs diameter were highly correlated with device size than BOD and 2D echocardiography derived diameter (2D echocardiography: r = 0.796, p = <0.001, 3D echocardiography: r = 0.960, p = <0.001, BOD: r = 0.840, p = <0.001). Conclusion: 3DTTE can accurately measure ASD diameter and can be used as an alternate, effective, and safe method to select device size.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saha et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Secundum atrial septal defect (ASD) (n=33). 3-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (3DTTE) vs. Balloon occlusive diameter (BOD) and 2-dimensional echocardiography was evaluated on Correlation of measured ASD diameter with deployed device size (r = 0.960, p=<0.001). 3D transthoracic echocardiography derived ASD diameter correlated more highly with deployed device size (r=0.960, p<0.001) than balloon occlusive diameter (r=0.840) and 2D echocardiography (r=0.796).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: