Key result
General anesthesia shows no difference vs combined spinal/epidural for umbilical cord blood gas or Apgar scores.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to analyze the effects of general anesthesia during cesarean section on umbilical cord blood gas values and maternal intraoperative hemodynamics.
Does general anesthesia improve umbilical cord blood gas values and hemodynamics compared to combined spinal/epidural anesthesia in parturient women undergoing cesarean section?
RCT (n=112)
Double-blind
randomized
Does general anesthesia improve umbilical cord blood gas values and hemodynamics compared to combined spinal/epidural anesthesia in parturient women undergoing cesarean section?
General anesthesia for cesarean delivery provides similar umbilical cord blood gas values and Apgar scores as combined spinal/epidural anesthesia, with faster induction and fewer adverse reactions like nausea and chills.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports either technique when neonatal outcomes are prioritized; confirms equivalence for maternal selection in cesarean delivery.
BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to analyze the effects of general anesthesia in cesarean section on the umbilical cord blood gas values and intraoperative hemodynamics of parturient women. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 112 parturient women who received cesarean section were eventually randomized into 2 groups, GA (general anesthesia) group (n=56), and SE (combined spinal and epidural anesthesia) group (n=56). The umbilical cord blood gas values, postpartum Apgar score, intraoperative blood loss, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, total operative time, time intervals from anesthesia to delivery and from skin incision to delivery, the incidences of adverse reactions and neonatal asphyxia, and the postoperative patient satisfaction were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in total operative time, Apgar score, neonatal asphyxia rate, umbilical arterial and venous cord blood gas values, intraoperative blood loss, and time interval from skin incision to delivery (all P˃0.05). The GA group was significantly shorter in the time interval from anesthesia to delivery than the SE group (P˂0.05). The incidences of nausea, vomiting, and chills in the GA group were significantly lower than those in the SE group (all P˂0.05). The GA group was significantly higher in postoperative patient satisfaction than the SE group (P˂0.05). CONCLUSIONS General anesthesia has little impact on the umbilical cord blood gas values and Apgar score, and ensures better hemodynamic stability in cesarean section. Moreover, general anesthesia is characterized by rapid induction and is therefore valuable for use in clinical procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in Cesarean section (n=112). General anesthesia vs. Combined spinal and epidural anesthesia was evaluated on Umbilical cord blood gas values (p=>0.05). General anesthesia for cesarean delivery showed no significant difference in umbilical cord blood gas values or Apgar scores compared to combined spinal/epidural anesthesia (P>0.05).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: