Basic reproduction number of African swine fever in wild boars (Sus scrofa) and its spatiotemporal heterogeneity in South Korea

Figures

• 

  Fig. 1. Diagram illustrating the course of infection of ASF, and the parameters in the spatiotemporal clustering algorithm: E for the time of exposure to ASFV; I for the time to be infectious after the latent period from E; R for the time of death after infectious period from I; Duration of viable virus for the time period for transmission viability of ASFV from the R; D for the time of detection after detection delay from R; Buffer for death and Buffer for detection for the time periods for cases that were infected at the initial stage of the infectious period, and infected just before detection of the ASF-positive carcass, respectively. ASF, African swine fever; ASFV, African swine fever virus.

• 

  Fig. 2. Spatiotemporal distributions for the identified local transmission clusters in each corresponding period: October 2019 to July 2020 (Top); September 2020 to December 2020 (Middle); December 2020 to April 2021 (Bottom): Non included represents the cases which were not included in the identified clusters in each corresponding period.

• 

  Fig. 3. Plots showing the seasonality of the identified local transmission clusters. Colors are assigned with their corresponding period. Grey area is for the unobserved period after May 2021.

• 

  Fig. 4. Plot showing the estimated basic reproduction number (labeled as dot) and its 95% confidence interval for each cluster. The colors are assigned with their corresponding period.

• 

  Fig. 5. Plots showing the association between habitat suitability of wild boar and basic reproduction number. (A) Ridge plots showing the distribution with habitat suitability of wild boar for each cluster. Cluster ID was ordered with its estimated basic reproduction number; (B) Scatter plot and regression line showing the association between the median habitat suitability of wild boars of each cluster and its basic reproduction number.