AIM: To compare the sealing ability and the canal-filled area (gutta-percha + sealer) of three current filling techniques in oval-shaped canals. METHODOLOGY: A total of 50 oval-shaped root canals were prepared and root filled as follows: G1: lateral condensation (n = 10), G2: System B (n = 10) and G3: Thermafil system (n = 10). All teeth were mounted in a two-chamber apparatus and the coronal access was exposed to human saliva. The appearance of turbidity in the BHI broth over a 15-week period was observed. A cross section of each tooth was made 5 mm from the apex and the samples were prepared for microscopic analysis. Digital image measurements of the cross-sectional area and the area filled by gutta-percha and sealer were performed. Log-rank and Fisher's exact tests were used to analyse the leakage data. Student's t-test was used to analyse the filled-area data. RESULTS: Overall, 30% of the specimens of G1 and G2 and 20% of G3 demonstrated leakage after 15 weeks and no significant difference was found amongst the groups (P > 0.05). The percentage of canal-filled area was 68, 70 and 78%, respectively (P > 0.05). The correlation analysis revealed no significant relation between the pattern of bacterial leakage and canal-filled area (P = 0.128). CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference in apical sealing and canal-filled area in oval-shaped canals was seen between the three filling techniques. No significant correlation was found between the quality of the apical seal and the filled-area of the root canal space.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
De‐Deus et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: