Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Toxic and/or carcinogenic consequences may result from metal ion substitution for the Zn-(II) in transcription factors containing zinc fingers, and the small Cys-rich metal-binding protein metallothionein (MT) may play a role in this metal substitution. To begin to evaluate this hypothesis, with regard to the carcinogenic metal ion Ni(II), a peptide corresponding to the third finger of the transcription factor Sp1 (Sp1-3) has been synthesized and its metal binding and redox reactions have been studied. The peptide binds Zn(II), Co(II), and Ni(II), with spectroscopic data indicating a tetrahedral coordination for the latter two; metal ion affinities have been quantified (Kd = 6 (+/- 3) x 10(-10), 3 (+/- 1) x 10(-7), and 4 (+/- 1) x 10(-6), respectively) and found to be less than those of an optimized zinc finger peptide (Krizek, B. A., Merkle, D. L., and Berg, J. M. (1993) Inorg. Chem. 32, 937-940) but greater than those of the second finger of transcription factor IIIA (Berg, J. M., and Merkle, D. L. (1989) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 111, 3759-3761). Reactions of the peptide and its metal-bound forms with dioxygen or hydrogen peroxide did not produce oxygen radical species; however, oxidation of the two Sp1-3 cysteines was modulated by metal ions (Zn < Co = apo < Ni), suggesting a protective role for Zn(II) but an enhancing role for Ni(II). Metal binding competition between Sp1-3 and the alpha domain of human liver MT-2 (alpha-hMT2) indicates a similar affinity for Zn(II). However, alpha-hMT2 has a higher affinity for Ni(II), suggesting that MT may play a protective role by ensuring Zn(II), rather than Ni(II), coordination to zinc finger sequences of transcription factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Posewitz et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: