Key result
Genomic test results must be contextualized using Bayes theorem, as the prior probability of disease significantly alters the likelihood of a true diagnosis in screening versus diagnostic settings.
Genomic testing requires clinical context and application of Bayes theorem for correct interpretation, rather than being viewed as determinative.
Genomic testing can be misunderstood as being determinative, when in reality it is the same as all other tests and context is essential for its correct interpretation. Two hypothetical cases of testing for Marfan syndrome demonstrate how clinicians should contextualize genomic test results and the implementation of Bayes theorem in clinical decision-making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leslie G. Biesecker (2019) conducted an editorial in Marfan syndrome. Genomic testing (screening vs diagnostic) was evaluated. Genomic test results must be contextualized using Bayes theorem, as the prior probability of disease significantly alters the likelihood of a true diagnosis in screening versus diagnostic settings.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: