Neutron- and proton-induced single-event upset cross sections of D- and DICE-Flip/Flops are analyzed for designs implemented in a 40 nm bulk technology node. Neutron and proton testing of the flip/flops show only a 30%-50% difference between D- and DICE-Flip/Flop error rates and cross sections. Simulations are used to show that charge sharing is the primary cause for the similar failures-in-time (FIT) rates. Such small improvement in the single-event performance of the DICE implementation over standard D-Flip/Flop designs may warrant careful consideration for the use of DICE designs in 40 nm bulk technologies and beyond.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loveless et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: