Key result
Combined anesthesia links to fewer complications, but lower MAP predicts ~16% higher fistula risk per mmHg.
Why the study?
The study investigated the influence of epidural analgesia and mean arterial pressure as risk factors for postoperative complications to evaluate the optimal approach to anesthesia and blood pressure management after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Does the combination of epidural analgesia and general anesthesia, along with mean arterial pressure management, reduce postoperative complications in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy?
Observational (n=234)
No
Does the combination of epidural analgesia and general anesthesia, along with mean arterial pressure management, reduce postoperative complications in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy?
Effect estimate: 15.8% risk increase per 1 mm Hg decrease in MAP
In patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy, combined epidural and general anesthesia reduces complications, while decreases in mean arterial pressure significantly increase the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula.
Objective. To study the influence of epidural analgesia and mean arterial pressure as risk factors for the development of postoperative pancreatic fistula, delayed evacuation of gastric contents and postpancreatic bleeding after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Materials and Methods. The retrospective study included 234 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at the National Research Center of Surgery and Transplantation named after O. O. Shalimov from January 2022 to November 2023. The surgical intervention included a standard pancreaticoduodenectomy according to the modified Child's technique. The objective was to evaluate the optimal approach to anesthesia and blood pressure management to minimize the risk of postoperative complications. Data were collected on the type of anesthesia (general anesthesia or a combination of general anesthesia and epidural analgesia), mean arterial pressure, use of vasopressors, and the incidence of postoperative complications. The analysis was performed using logistic–binomial regression to assess the risk of complications depending on the level of blood pressure and the use of epidural analgesia. Results. The combined use of epidural analgesia and general anesthesia was associated with a decrease in the incidence of clinically significant postoperative pancreatic fistula, delayed evacuation of gastric contents, and other complications. Epidural analgesia, although associated with an increased risk of hemodynamic instability, contributed to better pain control and a reduction in the incidence of postoperative complications. A decrease in mean arterial pressure by each 1 mm Hg increases the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula by 15.8%, which confirms the importance of maintaining an adequate level of pressure to ensure optimal tissue perfusion. Despite the hypothesis of a possible negative effect of vasopressors, their use did not show a statistically significant association with the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula. Thus, further studies are needed to clarify the optimal parameters of patient management after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Usenko et al. (2024) conducted an observational in pancreaticoduodenectomy (n=234). Epidural analgesia and mean arterial pressure vs. General anesthesia alone was evaluated on postoperative pancreatic fistula, delayed evacuation of gastric contents and postpancreatic bleeding (15.8% risk increase per 1 mm Hg decrease in MAP). Combined epidural and general anesthesia reduced complications, while each 1 mm Hg decrease in mean arterial pressure increased the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula by 15.8%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: