Key result
Functional echocardiography detects altered parameters in neonatal shock with ejection fractions strongly correlating across types.
Why the study?
Detection of shock in neonatal intensive care remains a challenge, prompting evaluation of the correlation between functional echocardiography and clinical parameters in term neonates with shock.
Does functional echocardiography correlate with clinical parameters in term neonates with shock?
Cross-Sectional (n=60)
Does functional echocardiography correlate with clinical parameters in term neonates with shock?
Functional echocardiography provides valuable adjunct information to clinical assessment in detecting and differentiating types of shock in term neonates.
May aid shock assessment in term neonates; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the correlation between functional echocardiography and clinical parameters in term neonates with shock. METHOD: Cross sectional study of 30 full term newborns who were clinically detected to have shock compared to 30 full term hemodynamically stable neonates. For statistical analysis, cases were further sub classified into cardiogenic and septic shock. RESULT: Functional echocardiography revealed inferior vena cava collapsibility index (cIVC), fractional shortening (FS), ejection fraction (EF), cardiac output and superior vena cava (SVC) flow were significantly lower whereas myocardial performance index (MPI) was significantly higher in babies with cardiogenic and septic shock as compared to the controls. Left ventricular end diastolic area (LVEDA) was significantly higher in cardiogenic shock whereas it was significantly lower in septic shock as compared to the controls. Also, cIVC was significantly lower and LVEDA was significantly higher in cardiogenic as compared to the septic shock. In cardiogenic shock SVC flow correlated significantly with capillary filling time and systolic blood pressure. The correlation between functional echocardiographic parameters of cardiogenic and septic shock showed that EF, FS and MPI were positively and significantly correlated (r 0.742, p 0.022 for EF, r 0.766, p 0.016 for FS and r 0.478, p 0.05 for MPI) whereas SVC flow and cIVC were negatively and significantly correlated between cardiogenic and septic shock (r - 0.655, p 0.045 for SVC flow and - 0.578, p 0.05 for cIVC). CONCLUSION: In the complex environment of neonatal intensive care unit detection of shock continues to be a major challenge. Functional echocardiography provides an adjunct information to the clinical assessment of shock and helps in monitoring the response to treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bandyopadhyay et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Shock in term neonates (n=60). Clinically detected shock vs. Hemodynamically stable neonates was evaluated on Functional echocardiography parameters. Functional echocardiographic parameters were significantly altered in term neonates with shock compared to controls, with ejection fraction correlating between shock types (r=0.742, p=0.022).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: