Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The receptor for interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) on peripheral blood monocytes was characterized and was compared with that of human WISH cells. 125I-IFN-gamma was specifically bound to both cells; however, different binding characteristics were obtained. In the case of monocytes, Scatchard analysis gave an upward concave dependency curve, indicating either multiple binding sites or a negative cooperativity among the binding sites. In contrast, a linear Scatchard plot was obtained for the binding in WISH cells. Competition studies gave even more striking differences. Acid-treated IFN-gamma (95% inactivated) effectively competed with 125I-IFN-gamma for binding to the receptor on WISH cells, but not on monocytes. The significance of these differences was evaluated by analyzing the various biological activities of IFN-gamma in these two cell types. IFN-gamma was found to induce an antiviral state in WISH cells, but not in monocytes. Acid-treated IFN-gamma was found to be almost as active as IFN-gamma itself in inducing HLA-DR in WISH cells, but was almost completely inactive as an HLA-DR inducer in monocytes. It is proposed that these variations in biological activity stem from the presence of different receptors for IFN-gamma in monocytes and in WISH cells. Moreover it is suggested that the immunoregulatory functions of IFN-gamma in monocytes are related to the presence of a distinct IFN-gamma receptor in these cells.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Orchansky et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: