Litholapaxy Vs. Cystolithotomy

No AccessJournal of Urology1 May 1963Litholapaxy Vs. Cystolithotomy Roger W. Barnes, R.T. Bergman, and Eugene Worton Roger W. BarnesRoger W. Barnes More articles by this author , R.T. BergmanR.T. Bergman More articles by this author , and Eugene WortonEugene Worton More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)64620-2AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "Litholapaxy Vs. Cystolithotomy." The Journal of Urology, 89(5), pp. 680–681 © 1963 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByIkari O, Netto N, D’ancona C and Palma P (2018) Percutaneous Treatment of Bladder StonesJournal of Urology, VOL. 149, NO. 6, (1499-1500), Online publication date: 1-Jun-1993.Vandeursen H and Baert L (2018) Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Monotherapy for Bladder Stones with the Second Generation LithotriptorsJournal of Urology, VOL. 143, NO. 1, (18-19), Online publication date: 1-Jan-1990. Volume 89Issue 5May 1963Page: 680-681 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 1963 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Roger W. Barnes More articles by this author R.T. Bergman More articles by this author Eugene Worton More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Loading ...