To analyze the functional differences of the insulin receptor substrate (IRS) family, the N-terminal fragments containing the pleckstrin homology (PH) domains and the phosphotyrosine-binding (PTB) domains of IRS (IRS-N) proteins, as well as intact IRS molecules, were expressed in Cos-1 cells, and insulin-induced tyrosine phosphorylation and subcellular distribution of IRS proteins were analyzed. In contrast to the distinct affinities toward phosphoinositides, these IRS-N fragments non-selectively inhibited insulin-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1, IRS-2 and IRS-3, among which IRS3-N was most effective. The mutations of IRS-1 disrupting all the phosphoinositide-binding sites in both the PH and PTB domains significantly but not completely suppressed tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1, which was further inhibited by coexpression of all the IRS-N proteins examined. In contrast, the N-terminal PH domain-interacting region (PHIP-N) of PH-interacting protein (PHIP) did not impair tyrosine phosphorylation of either IRS molecule. The analysis using confocal microscopy also demonstrated that all the IRS-N proteins, but not PHIP-N, suppressed targeting of IRS-1 to the plasma membrane in response to insulin. Moreover, the phosphoinositide affinity-disrupting mutations of IRS-1 significantly impaired but did not completely abrogate the insulin-induced translocation of IRS-1 to the plasma membrane, which was further suppressed by IRS1-N overexpression. These findings suggest that both insulin-induced tyrosine phosphorylation and the cell surface targeting of IRS proteins may be regulated in a similar manner through a target molecule common to the members of the IRS family, and distinct from phosphoinositides or PHIP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaburagi et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: