Key result
OCT identifies plaque rupture as the primary ACS culprit, occurring in ~44% of cases.
Why the study?
Plaque erosion and calcified nodule have not been systematically investigated in vivo in patients with acute coronary syndrome using optical coherence tomography.
What are the in vivo morphological features and incidences of plaque erosion and calcified nodule in patients with acute coronary syndrome assessed by OCT?
Comparison
Plaque rupture vs OCT-erosion vs OCT-calcified nodule
Design
Observational study using OCT imaging
Authors
Loading...
In vivo OCT imaging demonstrates that plaque erosion is a frequent etiology of ACS (31.0%), particularly in younger patients and those presenting with NSTE-ACS, and exhibits distinct morphological features compared to plaque rupture.
Observational (n=126)
What are the in vivo morphological features and incidences of plaque erosion and calcified nodule in patients with acute coronary syndrome assessed by OCT?
In vivo OCT imaging demonstrates that plaque erosion is a frequent etiology of ACS (31.0%), particularly in younger patients and those presenting with NSTE-ACS, and exhibits distinct morphological features compared to plaque rupture.
Jia et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (n=126). Plaque erosion (OCT-erosion) vs. Plaque rupture (PR) was evaluated on Incidence of culprit lesion morphologies (plaque rupture, OCT-erosion, and calcified nodule). In patients with ACS, OCT identified plaque rupture in 43.7%, plaque erosion in 31.0%, and calcified nodule in 7.9%, with erosion being more common in younger patients and NSTE-ACS.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: