Key result
Open chest CPR increases coronary perfusion and may improve ROSC vs closed compressions in non-traumatic arrest.
Why the study?
Open chest cardiac compressions in non-traumatic cardiac arrest have become rarely performed and the concept may warrant reconsideration due to evidence of superiority over closed chest compressions.
Does open chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation improve physiological parameters and outcomes compared to closed chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation in non-traumatic cardiac arrest?
Does open chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation improve physiological parameters and outcomes compared to closed chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation in non-traumatic cardiac arrest?
Open chest CPR provides superior hemodynamics compared to closed chest CPR and may improve outcomes in non-traumatic cardiac arrest, suggesting the need to reconsider its role in modern resuscitation algorithms.
Should not alter resuscitation standards; hypothesis-generating argument for open chest compressions requires prospective validation.
Since the popularisation of closed chest cardiac compressions in the 1960s, open chest compressions in non-traumatic cardiac arrest have become a largely forgotten art. Today, open chest compressions are only rarely performed outside operating theatres. Early defibrillation and high quality closed chest compressions is the dominating gold standard for the layman on the street as well as for the resuscitation specialist. In this paper we argue that the concept of open chest direct cardiac compressions in non-traumatic cardiac arrest should be revisited and that it might be due for a revival. Numerous studies demonstrate how open chest cardiac compressions are superior to closed chest compressions in regards to physiological parameters and outcomes. Thus, by incorporating resuscitative thoracotomies and open chest compressions in our algorithms for non-traumatic cardiac arrest we may improve outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kornhall et al. (2014) conducted a review in Non-traumatic cardiac arrest. Open chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation (OC-CPR) vs. Closed chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CC-CPR) was evaluated. Open chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation generates higher coronary perfusion pressures and may improve return of spontaneous circulation compared to closed chest compressions in non-traumatic cardiac arrest.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: