Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Statistical methodology for early stopping of clinical trials is well developed. However, in epidemiologic studies, methods for deciding early stopping have rarely been considered. In contrast to clinical trials, termination due to an early significant result is indeed seldom relevant, because further expenditure is then likely to be worthwhile in order to obtain a more precise effect estimate and to more precisely account for confounders. On the other hand, if data obtained early indicate an inconclusive final result and if continuation of the epidemiologic study is expensive, then it might be desirable to stop the study early. The present paper proposes a method for evaluating the possibility that an ongoing case-control study will produce an inconclusive final result. The method is developed for stratified case-control data. In principle, probable final results, given the available data, are predicted by repeatedly simulating the remaining data using plausible assumptions on the true exposure effect. These assumptions involve the current effect estimate as well as some alternatives, chosen with respect to the investigator's prior hypothesis concerning a harmful exposure effect, which are in reasonable agreement with the available data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ulf Strömberg (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: