Key result
Direct within-pen contact drives ~7-fold higher PCV-2 transmission than indirect between-pen contact.
Why the study?
PCV-2 transmission dynamics within and between pens in pigs were not quantified to inform epidemic modeling.
Absolute Event Rate: 8.9% vs 1.2%
PCV-2 transmission is highly dependent on contact structure, with direct contact resulting in significantly higher transmission rates than indirect contact.
May guide pen-level biosecurity in swine; leaves open translation to commercial herds and other pathogens.
PCV-2 within- and between-pen transmission was quantified by estimating the daily transmission rate beta and the basic reproduction ratio (R(0)) using a stochastic SEIR (Susceptible, Exposed, Infectious, Removed) model fitted on experimental data. Within-pen transmission was quantified by using four groups of eight SPF (specific pathogen-free) pigs (four infected and four susceptible pigs having direct contact). Between-pen transmission was studied in two groups of 16 SPF pigs (eight infected and eight susceptible pigs having indirect contact (10 cm distance)). Pigs were monitored twice a week (blood samples) and were tested for PCV-2 antibodies (ELISA test) and viral genome load in sera (real-time PCR). Transmission parameters beta(within) and beta(between) were estimated using a maximum likelihood method and the duration of infectiousness, to compute R(0), was estimated with a parametric survival model. Different assumptions were made to determine the end of infectiousness (seroconversion, seroconversion and decline in viral genome load, permanent infectiousness). R(0[within]) (8.9 (5.1-15.4)) was greater when the end of infectiousness was assumed to be related to both seroconversion and a decline of PCV-2 genome load in sera (average duration of infectiousness = 32 days) compared with only seroconversion as the indicator of recovery (R(0[within]) = 5.5 (3.3-9.0)). Whatever the assumption, between-pen R(0) (0.58 (0.23-1.47)) was always significantly lower than within-pen R(0). Only beta(within) was sensitive to the assumption on end of infectiousness and decreased with increasing duration of infectiousness. These results showed that PCV-2 transmission is influenced by contact structure that appears worth being taken into account in an epidemic model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andraud et al. (2008) studied Porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV-2) infection (n=72). Direct contact (within-pen transmission) vs. Indirect contact (between-pen transmission) was evaluated on Basic reproduction ratio (R0) under assumption of seroconversion and decline in viral load. Within-pen transmission of PCV-2 (R0 8.9) was significantly higher than between-pen transmission (R0 1.2), demonstrating that contact structure strongly influences viral spread.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: