Objective To retrospectively assess the results of buccinator myo-mucosal flap closure for secondary palatal fistulas in children. Materials and Methods This study was carried out in the department of Pediatric Surgery Pak-Emirates Military Hospital Rawalpindi from 4th Sep 2021 to 15th Nov 2022. All the records of children who were operated on with buccinators myo-mucosal flap were analyzed and were followed up. Their ages, sex, type of fistula, size of defect and buccinator harvest site were noted. Post-operative complications like cheek swelling, difficulty in chewing, flap detachment, flap necrosis and recurrence of fistula were recorded. Data was transferred to statistical package for social sciences-20 (SPSS-20) and analyzed. Results A total of 21 children were operated on during the study period. The age ranged from 2-11years (Mean: 4.5 ±2.11). Thirteen (62%) were female and 8 (38%) were male. Twelve (57%) had previously been operated by Veau’s repair, 7 (33%) had Langenbeck’s repair while only 2 (10%) were operated by Bardach’s two flap techniques. Fourteen (67%) had Pittsburg type-IV, 4 (19%) children had type-III while only 3 (14%) had type-V fistulas. The size of fistula ranged from 0.7 to 2.8cms. Facial swelling was observed in 8 (38%) and chewing difficulty in 7 (33%) cases. The child had to take only liquids during the same period. There was flap detachment in only one (4.8 %) case. There was no flap necrosis, but flap detachment occurred in one (4.8%) child. The flap was divided in all except one case at 2-5 weeks (Mean: 2.7 ±0.9). Conclusion Buccinator myo-mucosal flap can be effectively used for the closure of palatal fistulas with very little donor site morbidity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmad et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: