BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to compare stroke volume variation (SVV) assessed from a peripheral artery with the Vigileo/FloTrac system (SVV-FloTrac) with SVV derived close to the heart by aortic Doppler (SVV-Doppler). METHODS: Thirty patients undergoing liver transplantation underwent simultaneous SVV-FloTrac and SVV-Doppler measurements before and after intravascular volume expansion. RESULTS: SVV-FloTrac and SVV-Doppler comparison before intravascular volume expansion showed a mean bias of 0.7%, and 95% limits of agreement of -4.2% to 5.5%. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves generated to discriminate responders and nonresponders to intravascular volume expansion were not different for SVV-FloTrac and SVV-Doppler. CONCLUSIONS: SVV-FloTrac and SVV-Doppler measurements show acceptable bias and limits of agreement, and similar performance in terms of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing liver transplantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Biais et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: