Radial profiles of nuclear burn in directly driven, inertial-confinement-fusion implosions have been systematically studied for the first time using a proton emission imaging system sensitive to energetic 14.7MeV protons from the fusion of deuterium (D) and 3-helium (He3) at the OMEGA laser facility [T. R. Boehly et al., Opt. Commun. 133, 495 (1997)]. Experimental parameters that were varied include capsule size, shell composition and thickness, gas fill pressure, and laser energy. Clear relationships have been identified between changes in a number of these parameters and changes in the size of the burn region, which we characterize here by the median “burn radius” Rburn containing half of the total DHe3 reactions. Different laser and capsule parameters resulted in burn radii varying from 20to80μm. For example, reducing the DHe3 fill pressure from 18to3.6atm in capsules with 20μm thick CH shells resulted in Rburn changing from 31to25μm; this reduction is attributed to increased fuel-shell mix for the more unstable 3.6atm implosions rather than to increased convergence, because total areal density did not change very much. Fuel-shell-interface radii estimated from hard (4–5keV) x-ray images of some of the same implosions were observed to closely track the burn radii. Burn radii from one-dimensional (1D) simulations agree fairly well with measurements for glass-shell capsules, but are systematically smaller than measurements for CH-shell capsules. A search for possible sources of systematic measurement error that could account for this discrepancy has been unsuccessful. Possible physical sources of discrepancies are mix, hydrodynamic instabilities, and/or preheat not included in the 1D code. Since measured burn-region sizes indicate where fusion actually occurs as a consequence of all the complicated processes that affect capsule implosion dynamics, it provides exacting tests of simulations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Séguin et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: