Freestanding and tooth‐implant connected prostheses in the treatment of partially edentulous patients

In 123 patients, 339 implants were connected to 313 teeth by means of fixed partial prostheses (test) and followed up for 1.5-15 years (mean: 6.5). In another ad random selected 123 patients, 329 implants were connected to each other by means of 123 freestanding fixed partial prostheses (control) and were followed up for 1.3-14.5 years (mean: 6.2). The aim of this study was to compare both treatment modalities with each other based on implant, tooth and prosthesis complications. The cumulative implant success, based on implant immobility and/or lack of implant fractures after loading, in the test and control groups amounted to 95% and 98.5%, respectively. Although in the test group 10 implants versus only 1 in the control group failed, a regression analysis of the survival data, based on the cox proportional hazards model, revealed no significant difference. In the test group periapical lesions (3.5%), tooth fracture (0.6%) and tooth extraction due to fatal decay or periodontitis (1%) were observed, besides tooth intrusion (3.4%) and crown cement failure (8%). Framework fracture occurred in 3 patients. In the control group, only 2 abutment screws fractured. The treatment of partial edentulism by means of oral implants was beneficial for our patients. Because of a clear tendency of more implant failures (mobility or fractures) and tooth complications in the tooth-implant connected prostheses, the freestanding solution is the primary option to be considered. To avoid intrusion of abutment teeth, the connection, if made, should be completely rigid.