Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Structural analysis reveals one-dimensional lanthanide metallosupramolecular arrays directed by tris(spiroborate) twin bowls, indicating ionic radius governs crystal packing and assembly architecture.
Lanthanide(III)-containing metallosupramolecular arrays were prepared in the crystalline state simply by mixing trifluoromethanesulfonate salts of yttrium(III), lanthanum(III), europium(III), terbium(III), erbium(III), and ytterbium(III) with a rac -tris(spiroborate) twin bowl in N, N -dimethylformamide (DMF). In the crystal, the lanthanide(III) ion coordinated to eight or nine DMF molecules to form spherical tricationic complexes, and the spiroborate twin bowl iteratively glued the complexes to each other to form one-dimensional arrays that were unidirectionally packed in the crystal. In each case, the array structure was stabilized by many aromatic C–H···π interactions and C–H···O hydrogen bonds between the twin bowls and the lanthanide(III) complexes. Among the lanthanide(III) ions, yttrium(III), terbium(III), erbium(III), and ytterbium(III) gave almost the same crystal lattice and packing, whereas a different array structure and crystal packing was observed when lanthanum(III) and europium(III) were used, probably due to the difference of the ionic radii of the lanthanide(III) ions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Danjo et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: