Key result
Survey finds 54% of colorectal surgeons prescribe post-discharge thromboprophylaxis, constrained mainly by logistical issues.
Why the study?
Thromboprophylaxis is underutilized in colorectal cancer patients and current guidelines lack specific recommendations for this population and ambulatory settings.
What are the current thromboprophylaxis practices and attitudes among Australasian colorectal surgeons?
Cross-Sectional (n=128)
Yes
What are the current thromboprophylaxis practices and attitudes among Australasian colorectal surgeons?
The survey highlights that while Australasian colorectal surgeons generally follow available guidelines for thromboprophylaxis, logistical barriers and lack of specific data limit its use in the neoadjuvant and extended post-operative phases.
Logistical barriers limit post-discharge thromboprophylaxis uptake; leaves open the need for implementation studies and targeted evidence.
BACKGROUND: Thromboembolism is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with colorectal cancer, but thromboprophylaxis (TP) is underutilized. Current guidelines do not make specific recommendations for colorectal cancer patients and provide minimal guidance for the ambulatory setting, although emerging evidence suggests TP may be warranted during chemoradiotherapy or in the extended post-operative phase. A survey of Australasian colorectal surgeons was therefore performed to assess current TP practice and attitudes. METHODS: An online survey was sent to 204 surgeons who were members of the Colorectal Surgical Society of Australia and New Zealand. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-eight surgeons (63%) completed the survey. Most surgeons consult available guidelines, and where recommendations are made, current practice is in line with them. Lack of data, lack of ownership, logistical issues and an absence of guideline recommendations currently prevent surgeons from instituting TP in the neoadjuvant treatment period. Fifty-four per cent of surgeons currently prescribe TP after hospital discharge; those that do not, cite logistical issues as the main constraint. CONCLUSION: More data on thromboembolism risk during various treatment phases are required and should be promulgated in tumour-specific guidelines. Logistical barriers to adopting TP in the ambulatory setting should be addressed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smart et al. (2012) conducted a cross-sectional in Thromboprophylaxis practice in colorectal cancer (n=128). Thromboprophylaxis practice and attitudes was evaluated on Prescription of thromboprophylaxis after hospital discharge. A survey of 128 Australasian colorectal surgeons found that 54% currently prescribe thromboprophylaxis after hospital discharge, with logistical issues cited as the main constraint for those who do not.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: