OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) and (18)F-NaF PET/CT for detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Both patient- and lesion-based analyses were performed on 49 consecutive patients (median age, 67 years; age range, 57-80 years) with recently diagnosed high-risk prostate cancer. All patients underwent bone scintigraphy, whole-body MRI including DWI and (18)F-NaF PET/CT before treatment. Bone scintigraphy, conventional MR images, and follow-up images were used as the standard of reference to evaluate (18)F-NaF PET/CT and DWI. RESULTS: On patient-based analysis, five patients had skeletal metastases on reference imaging that both DWI and (18)F-NaF PET/CT could verify, and (18)F-NaF PET/CT and DWI showed false-positive findings in four and one patient, respectively. With lesion-based analysis, (18)F-NaF PET/CT and DWI showed nine and five true-positive lesions, zero and four false-negative lesions, and seven and two false-positive lesions, respectively. Two patients with uncountable bone metastases were analyzed separately. In these patients, (18)F-NaF PET/CT showed more bone metastases than did DWI. CONCLUSION: We believe (18)F-NaF PET/CT is a sensitive modality for detection of bone metastases caused by prostate cancer. Whole-body DWI shows a higher specificity but lower sensitivity than (18)F-NaF PET/CT. Future studies with a larger patient cohort along with analyses of costs and clinical availability are needed before implementation of these methods can be considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mosavi et al. (2012) studied this question.