Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Scanning SQUID susceptometry images the local magnetization and susceptibility of a sample. By accurately modeling the SQUID signal we can determine physical properties such as the penetration depth and permeability of superconducting samples. We calculate the scanning SQUID susceptometry signal for a superconducting slab of arbitrary thickness with isotropic London penetration depth λ on a nonsuperconducting substrate, where both slab and substrate can have a paramagnetic response that is linear in the applied field. We derive analytical approximations to our general expression in a number of limits. Using our results, we fit experimental susceptibility data as a function of the sample-sensor spacing for three samples: (1) δ-doped SrTiO₃, which has a predominantly diamagnetic response, (2) a thin film of LaNiO₃, which has a predominantly paramagnetic response, and (3) the two-dimensional electron layer at a SrTiO₃/LaAlO₃ interface, which exhibits both types of response. These formulas will allow the determination of the concentrations of paramagnetic spins and superconducting carriers from fits to scanning SQUID susceptibility measurements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kirtley et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: