Diapycnal Mixing and Internal Waves~iapycnal mixing is an integral factor in the meridional overturning circulation of the ocean.The slow upwelling in the ocean interior across density surfaces requires counteracting diapycnal diffusion.Diapycnal diffusion in a stably stratified fluid requires mechanical energy and the availability of this energy might well be the controlling factor in setting the strength of the overturning circulation as, e.g., discussed bv Munk and Wunsch (1997, 1998).The conventional wisdom is that• Diapycnal mixing in the ocean interior is driven by intermittent patches of small scale turbulence.• The turbulent patches have a vertical extent of up to a few meters and are caused by breaking internal gravity waves.• Internal waves break by either shear or convective instabilities that are caused by chance superpositions or encounters with critical layers.Confirming this connection between oceanic internal gravity waves and diapycnal mixing motivates and leads to funding for a large part of internal wave research.By understanding the internal wave field we may understand diapycnal mixing.Diapycnal mixing can also be caused by double diffusion, but this process will not be considered here.What is the state of our understanding of the oceanic internal wave field?This was the task put before the participants of the eleventh 'Aha Huliko'a Hawaiian Winter Workshop, held from January 18 to 22, 1999, in Honolulu, Hawaii.The meeting came at an opportune time.Major field programs had just been completed (e.g., the Littoral Internal Wave Initiative [LIWI], the Brazil Basin Experiment, the Internal Tide Experiments [ITEX], the Internal Waves on the Continental Margin [IWAVES] experiment).The interaction of internal waves with topography had extensively been studied and the significance of internal wave induced boundary mixing had been explored.It was hoped that formerly incongruent pieces could be synthesized into a coherent and consistent picture of internal wave dynamics and internal wave induced mixing.Howeveb the pieces still
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Müller et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: