Over recent decades, consumer demand has driven meat analogue development. While alternatives to minced meat products (e.g. patties and sausages) are widely available, replication of whole-cut meat products remains challenging due to their complex structure and composition including muscle fiber bundles as well as fat-rich connective tissue, which largely determine appearance, flavor, and texture. In this study, the applicability of novel a bi-stream breaker plate system in high-moisture twin-screw extrusion was investigated for the production of structurally complex, multi-phase meat analogues. An inline external gelation approach was employed using CaCl 2 -containing protein-mass to solidify alginate-based binders. Protein-mass temperature (100, 120, 140 °C), binder flow fraction relative to the extrudate (0, 4, 7, 13 wt.%), and dispersed oil content in the binder (0, 10, 20 wt.%) were varied independently. Samples were optically assessed (tearing analysis, Cryo-SEM, CLSM) and mechanical testing (texture profile analysis, cutting tests). Additionally, the rheological behavior of the protein-mass was characterized in dependence of temperature and CaCl 2 concentration. Results show predominantly homogeneous binder distributions up to protein-mass temperatures of 120 °C. Increasing binder fraction did not affect its distribution across the extrudate width. Mechanical analysis revealed a continuous decrease in chewiness (up to 48% reduction), while anisotropy increased by 40% upon initial binder incorporation. Increasing the dispersed oil fraction reduced chewiness (up to 17% reduction). Microstructural analysis confirmed that binder layers spatially separated protein strands, thereby inhibiting their recombination. This scalable extrusion-based process thus represents a promising alternative to 3D-printing, combining protein-rich and oil-rich layers into complex structures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pernice et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: