Key result
Insulin detemir cuts food intake by ~303 kcal vs human insulin, inducing negative DC-potential shifts.
Why the study?
Insulin detemir is less prone to induce weight gain than human insulin, possibly due to stronger central nervous anorexigenic effects, which this study aimed to compare.
Does insulin detemir alter brain potentials and reduce food intake compared to human insulin in healthy men?
Does insulin detemir alter brain potentials and reduce food intake compared to human insulin in healthy men?
Insulin detemir exerts stronger acute effects on brain functions and reduces food consumption compared to human insulin, suggesting an enhanced central anorexigenic impact.
Detemir's acute central effects on EEG and food intake in healthy men require replication in diabetes; hypothesis-generating for weight-sparing mechanisms.
OBJECTIVE: In the treatment of diabetic patients, the long-acting insulin analog insulin detemir is less prone to induce weight gain than other insulin formulations. Assuming that because of its pharmacologic properties, detemir displays stronger central nervous anorexigenic efficacy than human insulin, we compared acute effects of human insulin and detemir on electroencephalography (EEG) measures and food intake. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Frontocortical EEG direct current (DC) potentials were recorded in 15 healthy men during two hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamps that included an insulin bolus injection (human insulin, 17.75 mU/kg body wt; detemir, 90 mU/kg body wt) followed by a steady 90-min infusion (1.0 vs. 2.0 mU x kg(-1) x min(-1)). A higher dosage was chosen for detemir to compensate for its delay in impact relative to human insulin and to elicit similar systemic effects. At 20 min after infusion, subjects were allowed to eat ad libitum from a test buffet. RESULTS: Mean glucose infusions to maintain euglycemia (P > 0.93) and blood glucose concentrations (P > 0.34) did not differ between conditions. Detemir infusion induced a negative DC-potential shift, averaging -372.2 microV from 21 to 90 min that was not observed during human insulin infusion (146.5 microV, P = 0.02). Detemir, in comparison with human insulin, reduced subsequent food intake by 303 kcal (1,257 vs. 1,560, P < 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: While inducing comparable peripheral effects, detemir exerts stronger acute effects on brain functions than human insulin and triggers a relative decrease in food consumption, suggesting an enhanced anorexigenic impact of detemir compared with human insulin on central nervous networks that control nutrient uptake.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hallschmid et al. (2010) studied Healthy (n=15). Insulin detemir vs. Human insulin (17.75 mU/kg body wt bolus followed by 1.0 mU x kg(-1) x min(-1) infusion) was evaluated on Subsequent food intake (kcal) (303 kcal reduction, p=<0.04). Insulin detemir induced a negative DC-potential shift and reduced subsequent food intake by 303 kcal compared with human insulin (1,257 vs. 1,560 kcal, P<0.04).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: