Rapid and recent lineage radiations pose challenges to systematists. Using members of the highly diverseSimulium arcticumMalloch complex, we tested whether the cytochromecoxidase subunit I (COI) barcoding gene can differentiate black fly sibling species. Members of theS. arcticumcomplex were monophyletic in relation to two morphospecies and two cryptic species of theSimulium malyscheviDorogostaiskyet al.andSimulium noelleriFriederichs species-groups, respectively. Of fiveS. arcticumsibling species analysed, onlySimulium negativumAdleret al.was monophyletic. No other members of the complex could be distinguished using COI barcodes. The inability to resolveS. arcticumsibling species resulted because (1) haplotypes were shared between species and (2) the distribution of interspecific genetic distances completely overlapped the range of variation within species. Potential sources of incongruence between barcode data and species boundaries include imperfect taxonomy, inadequate genetic information, incomplete lineage sorting, and/or introgressive hybridization. We ruled out imperfect taxonomy because chromosomal, ecological, and distributional evidence support the validity ofS. arcticumsibling species. Therefore, current nomenclature should be maintained pending further study. We conclude that one or more of the latter three sources of incongruence could be responsible for the lack of reciprocal monophyly among species of theS. arcticumcomplex.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Conflitti et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: