Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reduction of [{WCl4(NC6H3Pri2-2,6)}2] with 2 equivalents of Na–Hg amalgam in the presence of phosphines gave the d1 complexes [WCl3(NC6H3Pri2-2,6)L2](L = PMe3, PMe2Ph or PMePh2). The crystal structure of [WCl3(NC6H3Pri2-2,6)(PMe3)2]1 shows the 2,6-diisopropylphenylimido ligand exerts a greater trans influence than a phenylimido ligand but only slightly more steric pressure. Solutions of complex 1 react with air to give [WCl3(NC6H3Pri2-2,6)(PMe3)(OPMe3)]2 for which the crystal structure shows the OPMe3 ligand lying trans to the imido ligand. Reduction of [{WCl4(NC6H3Pri2-2,6)}2] with 4 equivalents of Na–Hg amalgam in the presence of phosphines gave the d2 complexes [WCl2(NC6H3Pri2-2,6) L3](L = PMe3 or PMe2Ph). Complex [WCl2(NC6H3Pri2-2,6)(PMe3)3]3 reacts with alkynes L′ to give the complexes [WCl2(NC6H3Pri2-2,6) L′(PMe3)2](L′= PhC2Ph, MeC2Me or PhC2H) for which 1H and 13C-{1H} NMR spectral data were obtained. The crystal structure of [WCl2(NC6H3Pri2-2,6)(PhC2H)(PMe3)2]6 shows cis-chloro ligands, trans-phosphines and mutually cis-imido and alkyne ligands. The C(6) isopropyl group rotates to minimise the isopropyl group and PhC2H interaction. The complex [WCl2(NC6H3Pri2-2,6)(PhC2Ph)(PMe2Ph)2] can be prepared but not [WCl2(NC6H3Pri2-2,6)(PhC2Ph)(PMePh2)2]. Reduction of [WCl3(NC6H3Pri2-2,6)(PMe3)2](L′= CH2CH2 or CH2CHMe). A more bulky organoimido ligand or a large phosphine is needed to exert steric pressure in all the complexes prepared.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clark et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: