Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper describes the synthesis and characterization of RP(o-biphenyl)2 phosphine ligands (where R = PhO, Ph, and t-Bu), corresponding gold(I) chloride precatalysts, gold(I) triflate catalysts, and gold(I) π-complexes. All ligands and gold chlorides and three π-complexes were characterized in the solid state. The most significant differences between complexes in the solid state were varying P–Au bond lengths, a consistent reflection of the different electronic character of each phosphine. NMR spectroscopic data on enol ether π-complexes is consistent with increasing cationic character in the alkene fragment, from R = t-Bu to R = Ph and OPh. The intermolecular alkene exchange process for [LAu(methoxypropene)]SbF6 (L = PhO(o-biphenyl)2P) is faster than that of the analogous complex with t-Bu2(o-biphenyl)P, presumably due to the higher electrophilicity of the former complex. Examination of a series of vinyl silane π-complexes with triaryl phosphine ligands reveals increasing stability and ease of preparation (Ph3P < Ph2P(o-biphenyl) < PhP(o-biphenyl)2). These results reveal that incorporation of a second biphenyl substituent into ligand architectures allows preparation of a series of gold π-complexes with increased stability over a range of phosphine donicity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Griebel et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: