Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated the effects of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) in subjects on mechanical ventilation. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of MI-E on airway mucus clearance among mechanically ventilated ICU subjects. METHODS: A randomized, parallel-group, open-label trial was conducted between June and November 2017 in a single, mixed ICU. Adult ICU subjects receiving mechanical ventilation for > 24 h with stable ventilatory and hemodynamic status were randomized to receive either standard respiratory physiotherapy alone (control group) or respiratory physiotherapy by using an MI-E device (intervention group). The primary outcome was the weight of aspirated airway mucus after study interventions. Secondary outcomes included variation in static lung compliance (ΔC L ), airway resistance (ΔR aw ), work of breathing (ΔWOB) in relation to the pre-intervention period, and hemodynamic and ventilator complications during the procedures. RESULTS: There were 90 subjects in each group. The mean ± SD weight of the aspirated airway mucus was higher in the intervention group than in the control group (2.42 ± 2.32 g vs 1.35 ± 1.56 g, P < .001). The ΔC L values in the intervention group were higher than those in the control group (1.76 ± 4.90 mL/cm H 2 O vs −0.57 ± 4.85 mL/cm H 2 O, P = .001). The ΔR aw and ΔWOB values were similar between the groups. No hemodynamic or ventilatory complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Among the general ICU subjects receiving mechanical ventilation, use of an MI-E device during respiratory physiotherapy resulted in a larger amount of airway mucus clearance than respiratory physiotherapy alone. ( ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT03178565.)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Camillis et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: