Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Remarkably efficient inhaled antifungal monotherapy for invasive pulmonary aspergillosisTo the Editors:Voriconazole is a broad-spectrum antifungal agent that is effective against moulds such as Aspergillus fumigatus.It inhibits the cytochrome P450-dependent 14-a-lanosterol demethylase, preventing the conversion of lanosterol to ergosterol.This results in the accumulation of toxic methylsterols in the fungal wall and the inhibition of fungal growth [1].Voriconazole is available as an intravenous infusion solution containing a cyclodextrin molecule (Captisol1; Ligand Pharmaceuticals Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) to increase its solubility in water [2].Adverse effects, such as gastrointestinal disorders, visual disturbances and elevated transaminase levels, complicate the use of voriconazole if used systemically.The therapeutic concentration range of voriconazole is from 1 to 5.5 mg?mL -1 and, although higher concentrations (.5.5 mg?mL -1 ) are associated with better clinical outcomes, they are also associated with more severe and less common side-effects, including encephalopathy and hallucinations [1].Inhaled voriconazole reduces histological manifestations of invasive aspergillosis in rodents [3] and it has been proposed that a favourable lung tissue to plasma concentration ratio is obtained through this route of administration [4].Consequently, inhaled voriconazole may provide higher concentrations at the site of infection without increasing the risk of systemic side-effects.We present three cases in which life-threatening invasive aspergillosis was treated with systemic voriconazole, but due to unacceptable adverse effects, the treatment had to be withdrawn.With no other conventional treatment options, inhaled voriconazole was administered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hilberg et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: